|  | Posted by kashe on 10/30/07 11:29 
Broken again, jerk.
 On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:23:56 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
 
 >Top post fixed
 >
 >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:29:16 GMT, Justin <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote:
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
 >>>> news:slrndl5p0q.19s.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
 >>>>> Top post fixed
 >>>>>
 >>>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
 >>>>>> news:slrndl4u5v.rsu.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
 >>>>>>> gary.hendricks.user@gmail.com wrote on [16 Oct 2005 02:52:55 -0700]:
 >>>>>>>> Well, one such unit that playes 300 DVDs is the Pioneer DV-F727
 >>>>>>>> 301-Disc DVD Changer.
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> Does it play both sides?
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>> Smarty wrote on [Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:03:20 -0400]:
 >>>>>> No it does not.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Then, what's the point?
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>Smarty wrote on [Mon, 17 Oct 2005 00:18:08 -0400]:
 >>>> Neither the Pioneer 727 or the Sony 400 DVD changers can automatically play
 >>>> double sided DVDs. Since double sided disks represent a very small
 >>>> percentage of the commercial releases, and since many double sided disks are
 >>>> merely movies with one format 4:3 on one side and 16:9 widescreen on the
 >>>> other, the manufacturers of these jukeboxes believe (correctly) that the
 >>>> costs of adding dual sided playing would be unnecessary and overly complex
 >>>> and expensive.
 >>>
 >>>Yeah, except a lot of recent TV releases are double sided, with episodes
 >>>on both sides.
 >>
 >kashe@sonic.net wrote on [Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:28:25 GMT]:
 >
 >> 	Why fixed, arrogant one?
 >
 >For one, the thread was already a bottom post thread. Following it would
 >be much harder for people who are only getting the later posts.
 
 If they're not keeping up, let them read the rest of the crap.
 [Back to original message] |