Posted by Brian on 01/10/01 11:37

"Netmask" <netmask56NOFLEAS@geemail.com> wrote:

>The movie I just finished had a playing time of 1hr 58minutes
>
>part of the log follows
>[18/01/2006 15:31:46] Duration was: 1 hour, 25 minutes 41 seconds
>[18/01/2006 15:31:46] Speed was: 32.80 fps.
>[18/01/2006 15:31:46] Running second pass.
>[18/01/2006 16:51:12] Duration was: 1 hour, 19 minutes 24 seconds
>[18/01/2006 16:51:12] Speed was: 35.39 fps.
>[18/01/2006 16:51:12] Job finished. Total time: 3 hours 7 minutes 47 seconds
>
>So on my system a little over 3 hours for a 2 hour movie and that's fairly
>typical.
>XP with SP2 and all updates - 1 gig memory 2.8Mhz processor

Maybe I should upgrade my computer. It a 1900Mhz computer using
Windows XP (with SP2). I can't remember how much memory it has.
a 50 minute video takes over 3 hours (1 hour 40 minutes per pass)

I get this feeling that some programs are faster then others at
creating a DivX file. I know that some video editors are faster at
rendering a home movie then others.

Regards Brian

[Back to original message]