Posted by Gunther Gloop on 02/15/06 22:59

Temsonic wrote:
> "Gunther Gloop" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:45epvtF6c3dsU1@individual.net...
>> Temsonic wrote:
>
>>> It is a stunningly photographed film, and quite fittingly was
>>> nominated for Oscars in cinematography and art direction. Though
>>> lets be clear about this, it features a very nice shot of Audrey
>>> Tautou's arse, and I can think of no further reason why this film
>>> shouldn't be in everyone's collection :D
>>
>> Ah but _is_ it her arse!?
>>
>> Nice, er, cinematography on that scene alright though. ;)
>>
>> I'll definitely be watching again soon -I'm already half-way through
>> the excellent director's commentary.
>> (Tend to watch commentaries over multiple-sittings... would never do
>> that when watching normally.)
>>
>> -Kevin.
>
> Are you suggesting that a French actress might have refused to get
> her arse out on camera?? I was under the impression it was an
> obligatory component of the definition of the phrase 'French actress'
> ;)

On the commentary, Juenet says something along the lines of "I won't reveal
if that's Audrey's backside -I'll let you all have your dreams."

I'm of the impression that if she did have such a super arse we'd see her
face in the shot too.


....Reminds me of Britt Eckland in The Wickerman. She refused to do nudity,
so (the story goes) the director deliberately used a stand-in with the
fattest believeable arse he could find.

....Not that that has anything to do with Tatou's bum, but it just reminded
me of the story. :)

-Kevin.

[Back to original message]