Posted by Roy L. Fuchs on 02/16/06 17:31

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:54:49 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com>
Gave us:

>On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:39:16 GMT, Roy L Fuchs <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:43:57 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@PmunOgeBOX.com>
>>Gave us:
>
>
>>>To me, HDTV is too little too late. It reminds me very much of ISDN which
>>>like HDTV was about 3 times an improvement over the previous technology.
>
>> Apples and oranges.
>>>
>>>I expect video over IP to leave HDTV behind and be cheaper and offer far
>>>higher resolutions.
>
>
>> Hahahahha... Two words for your unable to grasp the requirements
>>ass... DATA RATE!
>
>> The SAME thing that keeps corporations from having decent
>>teleconferences. They have been trying for years.
>
>> I'd say you need to go back to school, but those remarks show that
>>you likely have never been.
>
>Your comments show that you've only been out of high school for about three
>years.

You're an idiot. I graduated high school before the days of the
audio CD, dipshit. So your capacity to assess is near nil as well.
>
>I've been around since the days of 110 baud modems.

Whoopie fuckin' doo. Your opinions place you squarely into layman
consumer grade knowledge of the industry.


> HDTV is an improvement
>albeit a tiny one over NTSC,

That retarded remark proves it even further. HDTV is an order of
magnitude better than NTSC from a visual point of view. You're an
idiot. An uneducated, consumer grade layman.

> but it will get left behind and history will
>remember it as small an improvement as ISDN.

"History" doesn't qualify its "memories". Had it not been for cable
modems, ISDN would have been what folks used all the way up until ADSL
was completed in design (not just concept) by the industry.

Apples and oranges.

[Back to original message]