Posted by Biz on 02/17/06 23:21

"waterspout" <wtspt.cb@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:U1sJf.1392$58.766@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>
> "only human" <surfer989@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:20472-43E8D7EB-68@storefull-3114.bay.webtv.net...
> > Um their would if he used something like a sound mixer with his recorder
> > which enhances any audio source material.
> >
>
> Why would you say that DVD offers an audio advantage over CD? You cannot
> hear the difference between audio sampled at 48k or 44.1k.
>

I guess you think that SACD's and DVD-A disks just a waste of money then?
No, there is not a great deal of difference between the two you mentioned
above, but when you start using 24-bit resolution, and even higher sampling
rates, 96khz, 192khz like is available on DVD-A, it makes quite a noticeable
difference...of course you wont hear it on a boombox, or some crappy PC
speakers, but serious listeners, with solid gear can easily pick it out...

[Back to original message]