Posted by HoMoon115 on 02/17/06 15:38

> Yes there is. I pay my 5.95 for all I can eat and I should never have to
> pay for food again.

> So? The ads state "give us 99 cents and we'll give you a burger". It
> doesn't work that way. You give them 99 cents and they stare at you
> until you give them the rest.

According to your broad interpretation of false advertising these
examples are infractions. However, you'd be hard pressed to find any
legal authority that would agree with you.

It appears we agree on a common point; advertising in a misleading
light is wrong.

What purpose does it serve to mention these marginal examples of false
advertising?

[Back to original message]