Posted by Rick Merrill on 02/24/06 20:05

Pete Fraser wrote:

> "Rick Merrill" <rickZERODOTmerrill@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cqmdnR6zhNA4UmHenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>
>>Sounds like something was perceived by the recorder as
>>in error - so it tried again, and again! Each file is
>>the-first-in-a-series (..._1.vob) so they could easily
>>be identical.
>>
>>Did you get a test disk with the unit? Did you try a DVD of the type
>>recommenede by '"Cyberhome"' ?
>
>
> I don't think I got a test disk, but I've had this behavior
> with a number of different disks.
>
> The recorder never seems to be in distress, so I'm not
> sure it's perceiving an error. It's not really a problem; more
> idle curiosity. The Cyberhome recommendations are
> "slower" than currently available.
>
> Thanks
>
>

I don't know what you mean by 'slower' - diff. speeds?
Slower is not necessarily worse: it could mean that the laser 'pits'
are bigger, cleaner, less fuzzy at the ends.

Is there any chance there is some 'redundancy' "feature" that is enabled?

Could it be part of a "multi-region" scheme?

Did it take a long time to 'finalize'? (i.e. this might be when the
extra tracks are created?)

(just WAGing)

[Back to original message]