Posted by Rick Merrill on 02/24/06 20:04

Pete Fraser wrote:

> "Rick Merrill" <rickZERODOTmerrill@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cqmdnR6zhNA4UmHenZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>
>>Sounds like something was perceived by the recorder as
>>in error - so it tried again, and again! Each file is
>>the-first-in-a-series (..._1.vob) so they could easily
>>be identical.
>>
>>Did you get a test disk with the unit? Did you try a DVD of the type
>>recommenede by '"Cyberhome"' ?
>
>
> I don't think I got a test disk, but I've had this behavior
> with a number of different disks.
>
> The recorder never seems to be in distress, so I'm not
> sure it's perceiving an error. It's not really a problem; more
> idle curiosity. The Cyberhome recommendations are
> "slower" than currently available.
>
> Thanks
>
>

I don't know what you mean by 'slower' - diff. speeds?
Slower is not necessarily worser: it could mean that the laser 'pits'
are bigger, cleaner, less-fuzzy at the ends.

Is there any chance there is some 'redundancy' "feature" that is enabled?

Could it be part of a "multi-region" scheme?

Did it take a long time to 'finalize'? (i.e. this might be when the
extra tracks are created?)

(just WAGing)

[Back to original message]