Posted by Hammerer on 03/02/06 22:56

"Morton Davis" <antikerry@go.com> wrote in message
news:lHDNf.797352$x96.361581@attbi_s72...
>
> "gregfarr" <gregfarr@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:gahd029acpsm246utlj4urm47ihpe10fng@4ax.com...
>
> > On 2 Mar 2006 02:02:43 +0100, "Hammerer"
> > <hammerer@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > <dennis6449@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1141253596.227419.278990@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > >>
> > >> The problem is that even if you've solved your issues,
> > >> many others haven't and you can't connect with them.
> > >>
>
> > > No, no. We can connect with our WinMX's fine.
> > > It's the many others whocan't.
> > >>
>
> > >> Then they IM you for help and there's little you can do.
> > >>
>
> > > Nonsense. There's plenty you can do. You can either place them
> > > in your 'ignore' file, or, better still, IM them back and tell them
> > > that they're useless leeches. That's my favourite.
> > >>
>
> > >> Limewire really is much better, even if Cj was trolling.
> > >>
>
> > >You can't get WinMX to work either, eh? Bummer.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I have special notes in Notespad, for sending to various dips.
> >
>
> People who can't get inMx to work deserve no sympathy whatsoever.
> It's simple as long as you don't do your best to make it difficult.
>

I agree, Snortin'. At last, you've written something sensible. Yes; it's
simple to show people who can't get inMx to work no sympathy whatsoever.

[Back to original message]