Posted by Broadway on 11/04/12 11:41

ken_and_or_kathy@yahoo.com wrote:
> This is being posted to newsgroups that have recently discussed Kate
> Winslet.
>
> Kate Winslet - she is not 'all that'!
>
> Yes, she is not all that, and she is not all that is portrayed! Fat,
> slack and saggy are 3 words that describe her very, very well. As
> witness her part "in the Franco-British 'Hideous Kinky' with Kate
> Winslet falling for Moroccan acrobat Said Taghmaoui" - "Sex in Cinema,
> 1999" - December 1999 Playboy. She is pictured receiving something on
> a small skewer from Said as he has mounted her looking as sexily as a
> fat pig like her can! One supposes it was an olive. OR a chunk of
> pork.
>
> Instead of being extruded as with most women, her nipples are dimpled
> inward quite unnaturally - sort of like a golf tee, but much, much
> smaller! It looks as if a BB (from a BB gun) would fit into the
> indentions of her nipples. Also, it is apparent that she was a victim
> of a 'breast enhancement gone terribly wrong' as her areolae have
> absolutely no form at all!
>
> Kate Winslet, just another fat/slack/saggy/talentless British bitch who
> just happens to be a redhead (unless her hair colour is fake as well).
>
> Few are aware that Kate pulled double duty in 'Titantic'. Not only was
> she Leo Decraprio's love interest (aka "fm"), but she also played the
> part of the iceberg that sunk the noble ship on its virgin voyage. All
> the white should have given her away as she played the part, but they
> DID have her suspended upside down so those false red locks suspended
> downward like the tendrils of a jellyfish.
>
> Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!!


I'd imagine you're quite the catch- and the one by your side has
perfect areolas and no indentation whatsoever.
Much better than this movie star trash, yes?

[Back to original message]