Posted by David McCall on 03/07/06 15:13

"Pat Horridge" <pat@remove-spam.vet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:dujjbe$7s$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk...
>
> "Martin D. Bartsch" <mdb@tele2.fr> wrote in message
> news:etbp02h330a29tkv0ld9c9rldrvukdtqj9@4ax.com...
>> On 2 Mar 2006 09:35:04 -0600, "Toby" <kymarto123@ybb.ne.jpp> wrote:
>>
>>>Can't he get an old BVT-800 for next to nothing?
>>
>> I tried this with a BVT-810. When your source is not synchronizable
>> (like VHS-decks) you get a nice burst and sync but also an ugly
>> vertical shift in your picture.
>
> Yes big as they were I believe they were still only a limited window TBC
> not a full frame store. Could be wrong it's been many a year since I
> tweeked one.
>
You are probably right. Memory was still pretty expensive when the
BVU-800 was designed, and 810 would have been in sync with the deck.
There would have been no need for a large window.

David

[Back to original message]