Posted by Richard C. on 10/30/05 16:42

X-No-archive: yes

"Invid Fan" <invid@localnet.com> wrote in message
news:291020051428114438%invid@localnet.com...
> In article <lvOdnQ_5ZaBXEP7eRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, Richard C.
> <post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:
>
>> X-No-archive: yes
>>
>> "Frank Malczewski" <malczewski@mho.com> wrote in message
>> news:1h548qm.l4prz41no1on4N%malczewski@mho.com...
>> > JAM <mayerj003@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Actually, I've seen commercials on television about this new DVD.
>> >> I've
>> >> seen
>> >> the commercial several times on cable. I'm not sure why it isn't
>> >> bigger
>> >> in
>> >> the stores, but they are advertising it.
>> >>
>> >> JAM
>> >
>> > Most people already own the film on DVD. Just happens to be the
>> > previous version.
>> ===============================
>> I refused to buy the original because it was non-anamorphic.
>> For a WS set, that makes it look like crap.
>>
> It'll be another 5+ years before I get a widescreen tv, so I can't say
> that was an issue when the dvd first came out (nor is it now).
>
=====================================
It will be................trust me.....................

[Back to original message]