Posted by Invid Fan on 10/30/05 19:49

In article <_f2dnSZ2ivOJZfneRVn-gg@comcast.com>, Richard C.
<post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:

> X-No-archive: yes
>
> "Invid Fan" <invid@localnet.com> wrote in message
> news:291020051428114438%invid@localnet.com...
> > In article <lvOdnQ_5ZaBXEP7eRVn-pQ@comcast.com>, Richard C.
> > <post-age@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> >> X-No-archive: yes
> >>
> >> "Frank Malczewski" <malczewski@mho.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1h548qm.l4prz41no1on4N%malczewski@mho.com...
> >> > JAM <mayerj003@hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Actually, I've seen commercials on television about this new DVD.
> >> >> I've
> >> >> seen
> >> >> the commercial several times on cable. I'm not sure why it isn't
> >> >> bigger
> >> >> in
> >> >> the stores, but they are advertising it.
> >> >>
> >> >> JAM
> >> >
> >> > Most people already own the film on DVD. Just happens to be the
> >> > previous version.
> >> ===============================
> >> I refused to buy the original because it was non-anamorphic.
> >> For a WS set, that makes it look like crap.
> >>
> > It'll be another 5+ years before I get a widescreen tv, so I can't say
> > that was an issue when the dvd first came out (nor is it now).
> >
> =====================================
> It will be................trust me.....................
>
No, it won't. I honestly won't care, most likely. I grew up watching
grainy UHF tv stations, so it's not like perfect picture quality is
something I demand.

--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS

[Back to original message]