Posted by audiohead on 03/14/06 07:01

NRen2k5 wrote:
> audiohead wrote:
> > Too bad you wasted your money on Zen which only supports MP3, WMA, and
> > WAV (which is worthless in a portable with limited storage).
>
> And your iPod only supports MP3, AAC and Apple Lossless.

And, Aiff and Wav. Zen only supports WMA and MP3.

>
> > The NRenCrapPacker5 is still in denial and can't admit what a fool he
> > is for not buying an iPod. I guess he's too busy crap packing tp to
> > realize that DRM WMA's can be encoded to the AAC format without loss of
> > sound quality.
>
> I certainly can't realize something that isn't true!

That's what denial is all about. I couldn't have defined it any better
myself.

> AAC is a *lossy* format, meaning whenever you convert something to AAC,
> you lose some sound quality. Whether or not its noticeable depends on
> who's listening, but there's definitely a loss.

Once again your feeble, concrete mind has pointed out the obvious.
Maybe you could understand the term indistinguishable instead? Anyway,
even with the loss it still sounds better. And that's not just my
opinion.

>
> > MP3 and WMA are dinosaurs like Dadion compared to AAC.
>
> And yet they still get the job done remarkably well. And they're a hell
> of a lot more common that AAC.

That's all going to change sooner rather than later.

>
> > Get out of
> > denial, get over it, and admit buying a Zen was a crap packing, dumb
> > ass mistake.
>
> If you expect me to do that, then you've got a *lot* of convincing to do.

Zen can't compete with i-Pod and will soon be discontinued.

>
> > Now go back to wasting your money on an inferior audio
> > format.
>
> Gladly.



>
> - NRen2k5

[Back to original message]