Posted by Rick Merrill on 03/14/06 17:42

davesvideo@aol.com wrote:
> Rick Merrill wrote:
>
>
>>That would be "You've" you meant ;-) Yes, I think you are right and I should just "ploink" 'im and leave it, as you will note I have in fact done.
>
>
> Now, that you have finished arguing copyright law with a lawyer,
> perhaps you want to take on the laws of physics. As a retired
> physicist, I must say. that just like those pesky copyright laws, they
> sometimes defy comon sense. Care to argue the case, that the Theory of
> Relativity is just plain wrong? Facts are not relevant and will result
> in no extra points. : -)
>
> Dave
>

You mean I was arguing with an ex-lawyer.


There really is no such thing as gravity? Earth sucks!-)


Tell me oh mighty physicist, what atomic particle contains the property of "mass"?

[Back to original message]