Posted by Neil Smith [MVP Digital Media] on 03/14/06 18:37

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:42:50 -0500, Rick Merrill
<rickZERODOTmerrill@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>davesvideo@aol.com wrote:
>> Rick Merrill wrote:
>>
>>
>>>That would be "You've" you meant ;-) Yes, I think you are right and I should just "ploink" 'im and leave it, as you will note I have in fact done.
>>
>>
>> Now, that you have finished arguing copyright law with a lawyer,
>> perhaps you want to take on the laws of physics. As a retired
>> physicist, I must say. that just like those pesky copyright laws, they
>> sometimes defy comon sense. Care to argue the case, that the Theory of
>> Relativity is just plain wrong? Facts are not relevant and will result
>> in no extra points. : -)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
>You mean I was arguing with an ex-lawyer.
>
>
>There really is no such thing as gravity? Earth sucks!-)
>
>
>Tell me oh mighty physicist, what atomic particle contains the property of "mass"?

Uh Gravitons ? (They're not atomic of course, but then no elementary
particles are "atomic"). If you need a Chemist to weigh in at any time
to clarify molecular science viewpoints, be sure to give me a shout !

Cheers - Neil

[Back to original message]