Posted by Derek Janssen on 10/31/05 22:22

Dick Sidbury wrote:
> One-Shot Scot wrote:
>
>> Now, if everything that we have heard is true, Warner has restored _King
>> Kong_ (1933) -- the Fay Wray version, not that Jessica "Oh Kong, Oh,
>> Oh, Oh Kong" Lange piece of shit -- to the Nth degree.

(Which, as pointed out, Paramount already released, and inspired Peter
Jackson to go back to 30's-retro.)

>> November 22 will be an
>> expensive day for me, because I plan to buy ALL three _King Kong_ DVD
>> sets.
>>
> Why? I was under the impression that the three disk set with the two
> other movies contained the two disk set as two of its disks? Am I wrong?

Nope--
You can get Kong *with* Son of (sorry, "Last Days of Pompeii" seems to
be on hold), or without, but it's the same Nth-degree Ultra print.

Derek Janssen
djanss@charter.net

[Back to original message]