Posted by nappy on 03/23/06 00:33

"TonyP" <arpierre@hooptown.net> wrote in message
news:s8lUf.776$q05.373@fe12.lga...
> nappy wrote:
>
>> "TonyP" <arpierre@hooptown.net> wrote in message
>> news:a22Uf.100$e52.44@fe09.lga...
>>
>>>nappy wrote:
>>>
>>>>"TonyP" <arpierre@hooptown.net> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>>>Elements seems to be an excellent choice for the budget videographer.
>>>>>
>>>>>>I thought you used Pinaapple stuff Tony? Oh No! You couldn't be
>>>>>>offering
>>>>>>advice on something you've never used could you Tony?
>>>>>
>>>>>Err... did you ever bother to read before replying? I'll answer that
>>>>>for
>>>>>you... "no". Re-read my reply, this time with reading comprehension,
>>>>>and
>>>>>then get back to me.
>>>
>>>>So you're an Elements user then. I thought you were a Pinnacle user.
>>>
>>>Wow.. try reading it again. Nowhere does it say that I am an Elements
>>>user. And yes, I am a Avid/Pinnacle user along with several other video
>>>programs.
>>
>>
>> So why would you comment on a program you don't use?
>>
>> "Elements seems to be an excellent choice for the budget videographer."
>>
>> Isn't that what you compain about ?
>
> The key words in my comment was *seem to be*. Now.. does that mean I have
> used it? No. It could, but I have not used it. From the reveiws I have
> read about it, they were positive. So, that is where the *seem to be* came
> from. Understand?

So it would be allright with you if I said Pinnaple products seem to suck
ass?


> Now, before you go off on your tangent, I have stated numerous times I
> would not buy Studio 10 in it's current state because of the *reviews* and
> on the web forum all the problems that people are having with it.
> BUT, you won't see that on the AVID LIQUID forums, or LE6.1. The same with
> DV500. Studio is a mixed bag. 9Plus works for me just fine (have you used
> it?) while others have problems (it could be the program or user/computer
> related).

whatever Tony! I never asked nor do I care what you are running or whether
it works or not. I think you are missing that fine point.


>

[Back to original message]