Posted by Steve on 03/24/06 21:30

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:33:07 -0500, Rich <none@none.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:22:47 -0500, Steve
><jazzhunter@atcollectorAGAIN.org> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:34:05 -0500, Rich <none@none.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:33:08 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
>>><roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:42:52 -0500, Rich <none@none.com> Gave us:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:37:57 -0500, "Irulan" <lrulan@comcast.net>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Rich" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:b3sj121ecin3kkekkc44l7d7dansh5q10n@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> Well, after 8 years and no problems (900 discs or so owned, 1000
>>>>>>> rented) I finally had a DVD deteriorate on me. The movie was "Trinity
>>>>>>> and Beyond" The Atomic Bomb Movie.
>>
>>I checked my copy of "Trinity ...The Atomic Bomb Movie" and it's fine,
>>but I have had about three or four DVDs go bad on me over the years,
>>of all different lables. It's still in print so you could try.
>>
>>
>>.. Steve ..
>
>You get spoiled with the Trinity, Nukes in Space, etc, movies because
>Kuran cleaned up the footage so well. I've even downloaded some stuff
>about this subject off archive.org, but of course quality varies, but
>the history is intact.
>The people at the production co. said they'd replace it for me, so
>all is well. A manufacturing flaw was their diagnosis, which of
>course we knew.
>-Rich

Hmm, I'll have to triple-check my copy if any had had a "manufacturing
flaw." It wouldn't be limited to just a very few discs, particularly
if the distributor autmatically acknowledges the problem that readily.

... Steve ..

[Back to original message]