Posted by JP on 03/25/06 13:31

"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
news:48kk9iFk6emjU4@individual.net...
> DubDriver wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>> || On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:37:41 GMT, Lordy.UK <spam@recycle.bin> wrote:
>> ||
>> ||| Bit of an over-simplification, they pay a small royalty to the
>> ||| Russian version of the RIAA, but that does not mean they have the
>> ||| permission of the actual copyright holders to do what they do.
>> ||
>> || Under Russian law they do.
>>
>> The Russian Authorities allowing them to sell Beatles songs is not the
>> same as The Beatles giving permission for them to sell Beatles songs
>>
>> || This is why they can sell Beatles tracks
>> || while itunes can't.
>>
>> No it isn't why they can sell Beatles songs, it is because they can get
>> away with it (so far).
>>
> If it isn't illegal, then it is legal.

Congrats to
An early entrant for the most idiotic post of the year.

[Back to original message]