|
Posted by JP on 01/19/94 11:43
"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
news:48nbmfFknup8U1@individual.net...
> JP wrote:
>> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:48kvtvFkg0tcU1@individual.net...
>>
>>>JP wrote:
>>>
>>>>"anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>news:48kk9iFk6emjU4@individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>DubDriver wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Dave wrote:
>>>>>>|| On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:37:41 GMT, Lordy.UK <spam@recycle.bin>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>||
>>>>>>||| Bit of an over-simplification, they pay a small royalty to the
>>>>>>||| Russian version of the RIAA, but that does not mean they have the
>>>>>>||| permission of the actual copyright holders to do what they do.
>>>>>>||
>>>>>>|| Under Russian law they do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Russian Authorities allowing them to sell Beatles songs is not the
>>>>>>same as The Beatles giving permission for them to sell Beatles songs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>|| This is why they can sell Beatles tracks
>>>>>>|| while itunes can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No it isn't why they can sell Beatles songs, it is because they can
>>>>>>get away with it (so far).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If it isn't illegal, then it is legal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Congrats to
>>>>An early entrant for the most idiotic post of the year.
>>>
>>>LOL - What would you say then? - That it is legal and illegal at the same
>>>time, in the same places?
>>
>>
>> "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a
>> fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
>> -- Mark Twain
>>
>>
> So you can't answer my question then?
> Move along - go and find a thread which you understand.
ROFL
plonker
[Back to original message]
|