Posted by DubDriver on 01/19/33 11:43

Diablos Rojos wrote:
|| "DubDriver" <dubdriver@somewhere.co.uk> wrote in message
|| news:iuadnb19BaqZyLXZRVnysQ@pipex.net...
||| Diablos Rojos wrote:
||||| "FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
||||| news:1143483422.983139.133910@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
||||||
|||||| Signal wrote:
||||||| What is obvious to most is that approx $0.07c per track is so
||||||| stupidly cheap, something is amiss.
||||||
|||||| How does AllofMP3 music even sound? Is there an average bit-rate
|||||| (Yes, I know that quality can be indpendent of BR)? Maybe it's
|||||| so cheap because you're getting what you pay for?
||||||
|||||
||||| CD quality 320kbps
|||
||| .... converted on-demand from allofmp3's 128KBps mp3 archive!? ...
||| well of course I don't know that for a fact but then nobody except
||| allofmp3 staff know in what format the original files are stored
||| before they are convert to the type you request.
|||
||
|| Here we go again........

Yes, here you go again not understanding my proposal

|| You can actually choose from a variety of download qualities and
|| types the price varies with the quality and type you choose.

Yes we all know that. If you read what I said again then you will see it is
about in what format they *store* their original file *before* it is
converted to the format you request. I'm a big fan of allofmp3, the songs
sound fine to me, but we have no proof that they are really are all stored
in a lossless format before conversion.

[Back to original message]