Posted by Bulla on 09/23/75 11:43

"Andy" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:122fcqn4vr7mdd8@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Andy F Batter" <uknewsgroups@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xsidnQqWHo8eMrrZnZ2dnUVZ8qGdnZ2d@pipex.net...
>>
>> "Andy" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>>
>>> Anti-climax doesn't quite say it. After all that i wouldn't even
>>> consider series2.
>>
>> That's the way I saw it to. It seemed more like a palce for an advert
>> break than for the season finale to take place. As soon as you watch the
>> start of the second series, you'll soon forget all about the flat ending
>> of the first though.
>>
>> With Lost you've got to understand it's not about getting to the
>> destination, it's about enjoying the ride. They're going to string it
>> out
>> for years, so you've just got to enjoy it on an episode by episode basis,
>> or not bother with it at all.
>
> I hear what you're saying but i can see us having the same exchange at the
> end
> of series2 and start of series3 :)
>
>
>

Thats the point though, its the not knowing thats half the fun of it, your
going to get an explantion at the end of it all so you just have to go along
with it. If you cant stand the not knowing then Lost isnt the show for you.

Bulla

[Back to original message]