Posted by Jason on 01/15/05 11:43

Since the name of the group is alt.video.dvd, any messages regarding
dvd technology or software are appropriate. If you don't like the
discussions here, why don't you go start your own group called
alt.video.dvd.moviesonly.byorderofRoyLFucks.

I sure hope it won't be much longer until you get your driver's
license Roy, then you might have something to do besides flame
everybody in this newsgroup.

Sincerely,
Rudy Russo

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:45:58 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
<roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:

>On 28 Mar 2006 14:44:22 GMT, colinm@rideau.carleton.ca (Colin
>McFadyen) Gave us:
>
>>In <kk7g22129f2kmhcsabspurasbi8csnua3p@4ax.com> Roy L. Fuchs <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> writes:
>>
>>>On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:03:31, rcs8@psu.edu (rcs8) Gave us:
>>
>>>>In article <wetraprock-C0A0C1.01440125032006@comcast.dca.giganews.com> Walter Traprock <wetraprock@hotmail.com> writes:
>>>>Not a DVD, but I do enjoy my bootleg of James Mason in "Bigger than Life."
>>
>>> You are both fucking retards.
>>
>>> BTW, retard, Usenet has line length limits.
>>
>>Since when does Usenet have line limits?
>
> It has had conventions and protocols for years, you retard.
>>
>>Newsreaders and editors have line limits.
>
> No, dumbass. RETARDED news clients like Outhouse Express that do not
>reflect Usenet's decades old conventions have PROBLEMS following
>known, established conventions. Most proper news clients have no
>problem with utilizing the proper line length limit, right from the
>get-go.
>>
>>This is alt.video.dvd. It has no official charter describing its use
>>or limits.
>
>It is NOT about any particular group, dumbass.
>
>> Discussions about copying movies, making DVD backups,
>>Netflix...etc. all belong in this group as long as they discuss DVD
>>technology.
>
>Wrong. The group was NOT about "DVD technology" it was about DVD
>movies until retards like you invaded it.
>
>>Whether or not a discussion is immoral, illegal or thought to be off-topic
>>by some net.cops is irrelevant.
>
>You are irrelevant.
>
>> This is an alt newsgroup. There are no
>>rules.
>
>You do not know anything about Usenet to begin with. How could anyone
>expect a retarded fucktard like you to know anything about a
>particular group within Usenet?
>
>>Do you even know what alt.* means.
>
>You're a goddamned retard, boy.
>
>> It stands for "Anarchists, Lunatics
>>and Terrorists".
>
>Actually, dumbfucks like you are very lucky that it doesn't stand for
>that, or you would likely already be worm food.
>
>> To which group(s) do you belong?
>
>Again, you're a goddamned retard, fuckhead.
>
>>Please look at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/alt-creation-guide/.
>
>Please fuck off.
>
>>If discussions that *you* deem to be off-topic, immoral or illegal really
>>bother you that much, feel free to create alt.dvd.roylfuchs.
>
>Usenet has line length limits, dipshit. None of your retarded
>attempts to shift the discussion elsewhere will change that fact.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>
> Pay particular attention to the bottom of page 3, dumbass!

[Back to original message]