Posted by Paul.Duggan on 03/30/06 06:06

c64fan@hotmail.com wrote:
> Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au wrote:
> > I don't blame others for my mistake. I made a mistake because of an
> > ambiguous sentence. I've told you this many times. Talk about lack of
> > reading comprehension.

> See, you've just proven my point. you are blaming *YOUR* mistake

Yes. *My* mistake.

> on the other posters "ambiguious sentence"

Even, gandrwedd, the "other poster" admits it was ambiguous. Yes, I
made a mistake. The ambiguous nature of the sentence is what caused
it, but it was my mistake.

> even though "52 extra issues" is *NOT* ambiguous

That is why I questioned the 52 issues part, because it didn't gel with
the rest of the sentence.

> and *YOU* were the *ONLY* person to make that mistake
> (the only other person to mention 40 was Aaron and he did so only
> because he was replying to a reply to where *YOU* introduced it into
> the conversion, NOT in reply to the origional post).

It seems like that if you read specific posts, but he denies that when
asked by email.

> > No, I'm stalking you to see if you're as bad on other groups.
> If that's what you have to tell yourself in order to feel better about
> your sad little existance as a stalker.

Yeah, pretty much.

> But hey, I'm giving you the attention you are craving by replying to you, so your day
> can't be all bad.

Well, I'm really getting the attention I crave from the sensible
conversations I'm having with gandrwedd and Ophidean on the original
thread and on other topics. Interestingly of the three of you who
originally told me that "52 isn't 40" until I worked out where the real
misunderstanding was, you're the only one still hanging on to the lie.

Why is this? Are you smart that all three of us, too stubborn to admit
you're wrong or too stupid to know?

===
= DUG.
===

[Back to original message]