Posted by c64fan on 03/30/06 14:17

Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au wrote:
> c64fan@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au wrote:
> > > I don't blame others for my mistake. I made a mistake because of an
> > > ambiguous sentence. I've told you this many times. Talk about lack of
> > > reading comprehension.
>
> > See, you've just proven my point. you are blaming *YOUR* mistake
>
> Yes. *My* mistake.

Yes and it took several days for you to admit that and even STILL you
blame your mistake on others as evidenced by the sentence:

> The ambiguous nature of the sentence is what caused
> it, but it was my mistake.

Sorry but there was nothing ambiguous about it when read in context.
not only was 52 issues specified, but the following sentence expounded
upon what was meant.

> That is why I questioned the 52 issues part, because it didn't gel with
> the rest of the sentence.

But it did gel with the rest of the sentence and the one that followed
it that expounded on the idea being reprented, which is why people even
worked out the math for you and you still weren't getting it. and once
you did get it you still continued to blame others for your mistake.

> > If that's what you have to tell yourself in order to feel better about
> > your sad little existance as a stalker.
>
> Yeah, pretty much.

well, good to know you realize how sad and pathetic you are.

> > But hey, I'm giving you the attention you are craving by replying to you, so your day
> > can't be all bad.
>
> Well, I'm really getting the attention I crave from the sensible
> conversations I'm having with gandrwedd and Ophidean on the original
> thread and on other topics.

If that were true you wouldn't be stalking me across the net and
continually replying to me about this same topic over and over and
over. face it you crave my attention and I'm willing to take enough
pity on you to give it.

> Interestingly of the three of you who
> originally told me that "52 isn't 40" until I worked out where the real
> misunderstanding was, you're the only one still hanging on to the lie.

1) it's not a lie, it the truth no matter how much you wish to lie
about.
2) the only reason I'm "still hanging on to it" is because *YOU*
stalked me to an unrelated newsgroup and claimed I lied, thus I
explained what the bee was in your bonnet. If you hadn't noticed, I
haven't posted a thing about the 52 vs 40 in the original thread in
days. If you hadn't of come stalking after my attention, this issue
would have been dropped long ago. You wanted my attention. You got me
attention. seems rather silly of you to then complain about getting the
attention you so desperately desired.

> Are you smart that all three of us, too stubborn to admit you're wrong or too stupid to know?

??? so much for your ficticious English degree, that made no sense.
Fortunately, with a little bit of reading comprehension (a skill you
have yet to learn) I can determine that what you were TRYING to say was
"are you smarter than all three of us...". All three? I don't know
about the other two (and normally I don't really care about who is
smarter than whom), but judging on what I've seen you post so far, it
certainly seems to me that I'm smarter than you. Perhaps in real life
you are much smarter than your posts indicate, but I've seen no sign of
it online. BTW it's rather obvious that you are the one "too stubborn
to admit you're wrong ot too stupid to know" hence your stalking me
over an issue that otherwise would have stopped being an issue days
ago.

[Back to original message]