Posted by c64fan on 03/30/06 18:47

Duggy wrote:

> > and even STILL you
> > blame your mistake on others as evidenced by the sentence:
>
> My mistake. It's not without contributing factors, but it's nobody
> else's fault.

Then stop blaming it on "ambiguous" sentences that were nothing of the
sort. Otherwise the TRUTH stands: you CONTINUE to blame your mistakes
on others.

> Why are you refusing, over and over, to accept this?

Because your actions don't match your words as you are STILL blaming
*YOUR* mistake on an ambiguous sentence that was *NOT* ambiguous. AND
because you keep it going by stalking me to other boards when the issue
would have died days ago.

> > Sorry but there was nothing ambiguous about it when read in context.
> > not only was 52 issues specified, but the following sentence expounded
> > upon what was meant.
>
> The following sentence, in the singular use of title, seemed to mean 4
> or 5 series a month getting the 52 extra issues.

Which simple math would lead most people making such a mistake to ask
if they really meant for there to be 64 (the normal 12 + the 52 extra)
issues a year or simply say "I'm not sure what you meant, can you
please clarify".

> > But it did gel with the rest of the sentence and the one that followed
> > it that expounded on the idea being reprented, which is why people even
> > worked out the math for you and you still weren't getting it. and once
> > you did get it you still continued to blame others for your mistake.
>
> So you seem to want to keep pretending.

So is the reality. You are the one pretending it was "ambiguous" so you
can blame *YOUR* mistake on someone else.

> > well, good to know you realize how sad and pathetic you are.
>
> Yup. Your turn, or aren't you ready yet?

I'm not the one stalking people to non-related groups in a desperate
bid for attention.

> > If that were true you wouldn't be stalking me across the net and
> > continually replying to me about this same topic over and over and
> > over. face it you crave my attention and I'm willing to take enough
> > pity on you to give it.
>
> It's up to you, you can either stop feeding the troll or you can admit
> that I've admitting my mistake, despite your continued
> misrepresentations of actual events.

the only misrepresentations have been yours. When you stop blaming your
mistake on others, then I'll accept that you've fully admitted your
mistake.

> > > Interestingly of the three of you who
> > > originally told me that "52 isn't 40" until I worked out where the real
> > > misunderstanding was, you're the only one still hanging on to the lie.
> > 1) it's not a lie, it the truth no matter how much you wish to lie about.
>
> Do you mean "it is the truth"?

Yes.

> > 2) the only reason I'm "still hanging on to it" is because *YOU*
> > stalked me to an unrelated newsgroup and claimed I lied,
>
> You did.

No, I did not. But you continue to lie about the situation by claiming
I did. Get over it and grow up.

> thus I
> > explained what the bee was in your bonnet. If you hadn't noticed, I
> > haven't posted a thing about the 52 vs 40 in the original thread in
> > days. If you hadn't of come stalking after my attention, this issue
> > would have been dropped long ago.
>
> With that lie still standing.

There was NO lie (other than your lie about me).

> > ??? so much for your ficticious English degree, that made no sense.
> > Fortunately, with a little bit of reading comprehension (a skill you
> > have yet to learn) I can determine that what you were TRYING to say was
> > "are you smarter than all three of us...".
>
> Never made a mistake? No. You made one in this post.

Yes, I've made mistakes. what I don't make a habit of (unlike you) is
jumping all over every little typo other people make while claiming to
have an English degree all the while (and quite ironically) making just
as many/just as bad typo/spelling/grammatical mistakes as the ones
being jumped on. I also don't go around blaming my mistakes on other
peoples postings.

> My BA(Eng) is real, but let's just make that a mistaken belief of yours
> rather than a lie, because you aren't to know.

I wouldn't question it's existance if you didn't act like such an ass,
jumping on other peoples typos/spelling/grammatical mistakes and
touting your ficticious degree while at the same time makes just as
many/just as bad typos/spelling/grammatical mistakes. or more simply
put PKB.

> > Perhaps in real life you are much smarter than your posts indicate,
>
> But my degree is ficitious?

The posts you have made certainly put it's existance in doubt.

> > BTW it's rather obvious that you are the one "too stubborn
> > to admit you're wrong ot too stupid to know" hence your stalking me
> > over an issue that otherwise would have stopped being an issue days
> > ago.
>
> I've admitted I'm wrong. Over and over.

That stop blaming it on others.

> So, no, I'm not too stupid to
> know. Yet you keep making the accusation.

Because you keep stalking me to other boards (hence too stubborn)
claiming I lied about you while you STILL blame your mistake on others
(hence too stupid).

> But, yeah, I'm stubborn. If I've been lied about, I'm not going to let
> the person run away with it still in the air.

Since you haven't been lied about, your are too stupid as well as too
stubborn.

[Back to original message]