Posted by selaboc on 03/31/06 17:10

Duggy wrote:
> c64fan@hotmail.com wrote:
> > No it wasn't so no it doesn't.
>
> You're the only one still making that claim.
>
> > All of the blame is yours.
>
> No.

Sorry, but it STILL is all yours.

> > It wasn't ambiguious, just because you refuse to admit it doesn't
> > change that fact.
>
> It was, and you know it.

It wasn't and you know it.

> > Since the only one lying here is you.
>
> Sentence fragment.

yes it was. Noticed it after I posted. Didn't care enough to post a
correction.

> > Better than your fanatsy.
>
> Your reality

*IS* the real reality.

> is a better fantasy than my fantasy, yeah. But at least
> my reality is real.

In your dreams.

> > All but the part there you continue to put some of the blame on the
> > sentence instead of where it blongs, on you. Why is my acceptance so
> > important to you?
>
> Because I love you.

Sorry, I don't swing that way.

> > The first time you accused me of lying, it wasn't about your mistake
> > but about you being the only one who made it.
>
> No, I think the most vocal and abusive time I did was, though.

liar

> > Since it has been proven that you were the only one who made it
>
> You had some tricky logic and it did make me stop and relook. And yes,
> there is no way you can tell from the posts whether he was referring to
> my replies or the post I was replying to. Emailing the poster
> revealled he was referring to my posts, by that included the sentence,
> and he read it that way too.

So you claim. Google tells the story of what did happen, not what you
wish happened.

> > (the only other poster to
> > mention 40 vs 52 did so in response to a response to you NOT a response
> > to the origional post that you blame for your mistake)
>
> Really?

really!

> > you've shifted your accusation about what I supposedly lied about.
>
> I've accepted that it could be seen the way you said, so I'll let you
> claim it if you really want.

how kind.

> > LOL. Learn to comprehend what you read and not blame others when you
> > fail to do so.
>
> An ambiguous sentence is an ambiguous sentence.

And the one you claim was, wasn't

> > What part of "you're still blaming others (the so-called ambiguious
> > sentence)" do you not understand?
>
> Series can be plural or singular. Do you not understand that?

Read in context. You do know what context is, since you claim to have
an English degree, one would assume that is something (along with
reading comprehension) you'd have to have learned in order to get one.
It's the lack of evidence that you have learned those things (based
solely on the posts you've made) that lead me to the conclusion that
your degree is ficticious.

> > you certainly have been. As long as you keep lying I'll keep correcting
> > you and this will never end (no doubt annoying the hell out of the
> > unrelated NG that you've stalked this issue to) is that really what you
> > want? If so, keep lying.
>
> Well, it doesn't really worry me.

Why do you think it worries me? I'm not the one demanding acceptance
from others.

[Back to original message]