Posted by Dummy on 04/03/06 13:19

selaboc wrote:

> > > > > All of the blame is yours.
> > > > No.
> > > Sorry, but it STILL is all yours.
> > Isn't.
> *IS*

*IS* not.

> > > > > It wasn't ambiguious, just because you refuse to admit it doesn't
> > > > > change that fact.
> > > > It was, and you know it.
> > > It wasn't and you know it.
> > Was.
> wasn't

*WAS*

> > Fair enough. Why is it mistakes are far more obvious the second you
> > hit send?
> One of life's ironies

Someone up there hates us.

> > > > > Better than your fanatsy.
> > > > Your reality
> > > *IS* the real reality.
> > Isn't.
> *IS*

*IS* not.

> > No. In my dreams is fantasy. My reality is real.
> You're deluded,

You are.

> > > > Because I love you.
> > > Sorry, I don't swing that way.
> > You like men?
> No Paul, I don't. I like women. Which a troll-boy like you isn't.

Good point.

> > > > No, I think the most vocal and abusive time I did was, though.
> > > liar
> > Nope.
> Yep.

Nope.

> Or should I be saying Duck season?

I don't think we're there yet.

> > > really!
> > Not really.
> Yes, really!

No.

> > > Read in context.
> > The context wasn't helpful.
> Yes it was. the following sentence (part of the context) was an
> amplification on the idea which, had you applied some simple math
> skills, would have told you that the poster was NOT talking about 40
> extra when he said 52 extra.

The following sentence, in the other reading, implied a number of
titles getting the weekly treatment. I've said this before.

> Apparently you don't, which is why I said if you did, it would have
> been something you would have to have learned. Since you obviously
> didn't learn it, your claims to a degree appear ficticious. You want me
> to believe you have a degree, start showing some comprehension and
> understanding of context.

I do.

> > > you'd have to have learned in order to get one.
> > > It's the lack of evidence that you have learned those things (based
> > > solely on the posts you've made) that lead me to the conclusion that
> > > your degree is ficticious.
> > Your conclusion is false. That's hardly unsual.
> You are wrong, as usual.

I have a degree. Therefore, you're wrong. Therefore your conclusion
is false.

> > > Why do you think it worries me? I'm not the one demanding acceptance
> > > from others.
> > Then who is?
> you are the one demanding acceptance by stalking me across the net and
> making up lies about me.

Me?

===
= DUG.
===

[Back to original message]