|
Posted by Richard C. on 11/05/05 16:15
X-No-archive: yes
"WinField" <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:lS3bf.56868$fE5.28970@fed1read06...
> When I go to the next message in a thread, my sole interest is what THAT
> poster has answered - not rereading the same paragraphs over and over.
>
> Each poster has the right to edit as he sees fit. It's a judgment call. I
> will not tolerate some Taliban Mullah (Bob & Nunya) telling me how to
> post.
>
=================
Good
===================
>
> Bob wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:39:20 GMT, NunYa Bidness
>> <nunyabidness@nunyabidness.org> wrote:
>>
=================
For
=================
>>
>>>Somebody needs to start walking up to them, and breaking their cues.
>>
>>
>> Shoving the cue up their ass and then breaking it would get their
>> attention.
>
===================
You!
===================
> What an ridiculous analogy! Editing text messages and sitting on pool
> tables, eh? No wonder you two bimbos are having a hissy fit.
>
> May I suggest the Netscape newsgroups if you want to hang-out with folks
> who still insist on bottom-posting. And to top it off, some are elitists
> in that newsgroup who sniff the air importantly as they carry on the
> tradition started by the hemmoroidal control-freaks (sys-admins) from the
> mainframe days of computing.
>
======================
I
======================
> Now get your wide-screen, flatulent asses out of here if you can't handle
> modern discourse. Otherwise, keep your pieholes shut on this topic
> please. Enough already about bottom_posting.
>
> - winf
========================
Agree!
=============================
[Back to original message]
|