|  | Posted by William Davis on 04/05/06 22:08 
In article <LnWYf.2589$v9.2219@trndny01>, "doc" <doc@anywhere.com> wrote:
 
 > instead of trying to get ur mac to act like a windows machine, why not just
 > get a pc?  also, i don't know many people that want to do it the other way.
 >
 > drd  :o)
 >
 > "William Davis" <davisbill@mac.com> wrote in message
 > news:davisbill-1ED27D.13475805042006@news.west.cox.net...
 > >
 > > New Wintel Macs to do Windows
 > > Interesting language in the press release today. Breath being held all
 > > around the world.
 > > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/apr/05bootcamp.html
 
 
 It doesn't surprise me that many people will see this just as you do.
 
 I suspect that if you ever have a chance to actually experience the
 difference between the two operating systems, you might actually realize
 that some of the things  that Macs have always done DIFFERENTLY are
 actually done BETTER than they're done on the PC side. (certainly not
 everything, but certainly SOME things.)
 
 Examples would be the tight integration of items like the iPod and the
 Mac OS, Wireless stuff like Bonjour, Widgets technology, etc, etc, etc.
 Not that windows can't do much of the same stuff, but you'd discover
 that the IMPLEMENTATION on the Mac side is generally tighter and often
 common tasks are MUCH easier to accomplish precisely because one team of
 hardware, software, and OS engineers have spent their time working
 TOGETHER rather than in separate camps to develop the solutions.
 
 The smart guy said that if the tool you have is a hammer, all problems
 start to look like nails.
 
 If you have experience essentially ONLY on a PC - (or ONLY on a Mac for
 that matter) you tend to see solutions in terms of what you're familiar
 with. And too many of us NEVER explore what the other side might have
 that we could benefit from.
 
 Now, MAC people will have better access to ALL the available tools on
 both platforms.
 
 Unfortunately, PC people won't be able to say the same.
 [Back to original message] |