Posted by WinField on 11/05/05 20:20

I appreciate your good humor on this sensitive subject, Richard.
Your response made me feel better this afternoon. {{ winf }}

Richard C. wrote:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> "WinField" <doghouse@operamail.com> wrote in message
> news:lS3bf.56868$fE5.28970@fed1read06...
>
>> When I go to the next message in a thread, my sole interest is what
>> THAT poster has answered - not rereading the same paragraphs over and
>> over.
>>
>> Each poster has the right to edit as he sees fit. It's a judgment
>> call. I will not tolerate some Taliban Mullah (Bob & Nunya) telling me
>> how to post.
>>
> =================
> Good
> ===================
>
>>
>> Bob wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 09:39:20 GMT, NunYa Bidness
>>> <nunyabidness@nunyabidness.org> wrote:
>>>
> =================
> For
> =================
>
>>>
>>>> Somebody needs to start walking up to them, and breaking their cues.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Shoving the cue up their ass and then breaking it would get their
>>> attention.
>>
>>
> ===================
> You!
> ===================
>
>> What an ridiculous analogy! Editing text messages and sitting on pool
>> tables, eh? No wonder you two bimbos are having a hissy fit.
>>
>> May I suggest the Netscape newsgroups if you want to hang-out with
>> folks who still insist on bottom-posting. And to top it off, some are
>> elitists in that newsgroup who sniff the air importantly as they carry
>> on the tradition started by the hemmoroidal control-freaks
>> (sys-admins) from the mainframe days of computing.
>>
> ======================
> I
> ======================
>
>> Now get your wide-screen, flatulent asses out of here if you can't
>> handle modern discourse. Otherwise, keep your pieholes shut on this
>> topic please. Enough already about bottom_posting.
>>
>> - winf
>
>
> ========================
> Agree!
> =============================

[Back to original message]