|
|
Posted by doc on 01/10/10 11:44
WoW! that link is great: http://amd64live.com/
everything in those videos states our reasons for switching from Mac's to
PC's for both our audio and video businesses. especially well stated was
Peter Frampton's statements. we had the same issues and found the same
solutions when we made the switch. stability and speed. although, we use
steinberg the same stability issues came into our arena when we got rid of
the G5's and Pro Tools, let alone the awful proprietary digidesign stuff :o(
Thanks for the link. just sent it to all my buddies who have switched to
pc's in the last two years also.
drd
"Greg Melton" <greg.melton@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:p0ab329aq22r03v97kjn5fg9jd3ug5bp8f@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:03:27 +0100, "Specs" <No.Spam@Thanks.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
>>news:123adlo2ssuqda8@corp.supernews.com...
>>> "Specs"wrote ...
>>> > I don't think the 90/10 split follows for the creative
>>> > industry. Macs dominate Audio and publishing fields.
>>>
>>> That is the popular myth. But you wouldn't get any support
>>> from the people over on the audio newsgroups. Besides,
>>> what difference does it make?
>>>
>>
>>It doesn't make any difference whatsoever. I was giving you the benefit
>>of
>>my experience. I have _never_ seen a PC in a recording studio. I have
>>visited hundreds in my time. I have lots of personal friends in the music
>>business in the UK and have yet to see anything other than a Mac.
>>Similarly
>>I have seen the majority of print publishing firms still using Macs. Ad
>>Agencies too invariably use Macs in _MY_ experience.
>>
>>Perhaps the people frequent the audio newsgroups are indicative of another
>>sector i.e. the hobbyist that likes to spend time impressing each other
>>how
>>"pro" they are. Ring any bells Richard? My "real world" experience is to
>>the contrary.
>>
>>> I was being generous. It is more like 95 vs. 5.
>>>
>>> > Without OS X who would Microsoft get their ideas from?
>>> > The 90% PC market might just need OS X more than they know.
>>>
>>> You are really a master of the popular myth, aren't you?
>>> Perhaps you should look up the Palo Alto Research Center
>>> (Xerox) if you want to know where most of the windowing
>>> and mouse-related user interface ideas were developed.
>>> (Back when Jobs and Wozniak were fooling around in their
>>> garage.)
>>>
>>
>>I am perfectly aware of the history of the mouse based gui. So where is
>>the
>>Xerox GUI now? Surely nobody can deny that Apple developed it and
>>popularised it along with Commodore. M$ has always been playing catchup
>>to
>>someone or other.
>>
>>Vista bears little or no resemblance to OS X does it?
>>
>>> > Microsoft does appear to be having its fair share of problems with
>>> > Vista at
>>> > the moment which could open the door for Apple.
>>> > http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2006/03/vista-2007-fire-leadership-now.html
>>>
>>> It has never worked for Apple before, but I guess you
>>> still have hope! :-)
>>>
>>
>>Anyone who believes in a free market should hope OS X and for that matter
>>Linux continue to develop their market share because a M$ hegemony is not
>>good for anyone. Its clearly not good for M$.
>>
>>For the record I have never owned anything by Apple not even an iPod. I
>>am
>>not an Apple fanboy quite the reverse actually. Credit where credit is
>>due
>>was the point I was making. :-)
>>
>
> I do on-going shoots for AMD64 processors (for PC platforms of
> course), and if you're interested in hearing what some pretty well
> respected artists, producers and engineers have to say, check it out
> for yourself. The work Mac never entered the picture.
>
> http://amd64live.com/
>
> Ciao,
> Greg
[Back to original message]
|