Posted by Specs on 01/10/28 11:44

"Greg Melton" <greg.melton@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v9bb32d6b1l9mt9j7a26ul1omi0bg75797@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:57:06 -0700, Greg Melton
> <greg.melton@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 18:03:27 +0100, "Specs" <No.Spam@Thanks.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>"Richard Crowley" <rcrowley@xpr7t.net> wrote in message
> >>news:123adlo2ssuqda8@corp.supernews.com...
> >>> "Specs"wrote ...
> >>> > I don't think the 90/10 split follows for the creative
> >>> > industry. Macs dominate Audio and publishing fields.
> >>>
> >>> That is the popular myth. But you wouldn't get any support
> >>> from the people over on the audio newsgroups. Besides,
> >>> what difference does it make?
> >>>
> >>
> >>It doesn't make any difference whatsoever. I was giving you the benefit
of
> >>my experience. I have _never_ seen a PC in a recording studio. I have
> >>visited hundreds in my time. I have lots of personal friends in the
music
> >>business in the UK and have yet to see anything other than a Mac.
Similarly
> >>I have seen the majority of print publishing firms still using Macs. Ad
> >>Agencies too invariably use Macs in _MY_ experience.
> >>
> >>Perhaps the people frequent the audio newsgroups are indicative of
another
> >>sector i.e. the hobbyist that likes to spend time impressing each other
how
> >>"pro" they are. Ring any bells Richard? My "real world" experience is
to
> >>the contrary.
> >>
> >>> I was being generous. It is more like 95 vs. 5.
> >>>
> >>> > Without OS X who would Microsoft get their ideas from?
> >>> > The 90% PC market might just need OS X more than they know.
> >>>
> >>> You are really a master of the popular myth, aren't you?
> >>> Perhaps you should look up the Palo Alto Research Center
> >>> (Xerox) if you want to know where most of the windowing
> >>> and mouse-related user interface ideas were developed.
> >>> (Back when Jobs and Wozniak were fooling around in their
> >>> garage.)
> >>>
> >>
> >>I am perfectly aware of the history of the mouse based gui. So where is
the
> >>Xerox GUI now? Surely nobody can deny that Apple developed it and
> >>popularised it along with Commodore. M$ has always been playing catchup
to
> >>someone or other.
> >>
> >>Vista bears little or no resemblance to OS X does it?
> >>
> >>> > Microsoft does appear to be having its fair share of problems with
> >>> > Vista at
> >>> > the moment which could open the door for Apple.
> >>> >
http://minimsft.blogspot.com/2006/03/vista-2007-fire-leadership-now.html
> >>>
> >>> It has never worked for Apple before, but I guess you
> >>> still have hope! :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >>Anyone who believes in a free market should hope OS X and for that
matter
> >>Linux continue to develop their market share because a M$ hegemony is
not
> >>good for anyone. Its clearly not good for M$.
> >>
> >>For the record I have never owned anything by Apple not even an iPod. I
am
> >>not an Apple fanboy quite the reverse actually. Credit where credit is
due
> >>was the point I was making. :-)
> >>
> >
> >I do on-going shoots for AMD64 processors (for PC platforms of
> >course), and if you're interested in hearing what some pretty well
> >respected artists, producers and engineers have to say, check it out
> >for yourself. The work Mac never entered the picture.
> >
> >http://amd64live.com/
> >
> >Ciao,
> >Greg
>
> On review the word MAC did come up. Peter Frampton states he switched
> from MAC to Windows. Sorry!
>
> Greg
Clearly you've missed the point. Its not about a choice between Mac or
windows since Apple now sells PCs called Macs. Its a choice between using a
PC that can run OS X, Windows and Linux all on the same box and a PC from
another manufacturer that can run Windows and Linux. That's the choice...

All the fanboy PC vs Mac crap which you clearly lap up is utter nonsense.
Like it always has been which ever side of the fence one happens to be on.

You have to hand it to AMD using a 57 year old has been stadium rocker as
the epitome of cool. Yeah, lets rock.

[Back to original message]