Posted by anthonyberet on 04/17/06 01:29

Don M. wrote:
> "anthonyberet" <nospam@me.invalid> wrote in message news:49gc9iFodm85U1@individual.net...
>> I had uninstalled Winmx for a bit, and have been using Emule, which
>> seems very good, and BT which I have been using for ages anyway.
>> However, I just reinstalled Winmx, and have been seeding a set of files
>> which I actually got from Winmx a couple of years ago - I am glad to say
>> they are being snapped-up.
>>
> ========
>
> Troublemaker.

I can but try...

>
>> What does the future hold for Winmx now? - The network seems just as
>> healthy as it ever did, with 1000s (plural) of chatrooms, and there
>> seems to be less leeches. I also have a really fast new connection and
>> so have been pumping stuff out at impressive rates, (ooerr Hammerer).
>>
>
> One thousands (sic)?

Nope, some inderminate number of thousands.
(Which might of course be less then two - really, this was settled to
everyone's satisfaction some time ago - I am not sure why you keep
bringing it up).

> BTW, it is 'fewer leeches', not 'less leeches'.

I expect I could defend myself, but as I also like to be a grammar-nazi
at times, I lift my hat to you, you cunning linguist you!
>
>
>> And yet this group is clearly in its death-throes - there is no handy
>> link from winmx.com to point the way here anymore.....does this mean the
>> WPN is similarly doomed as newbies dry up? Can we do anything to
>> jump-start a.m.m.w? Is there any pouint, as despite its functioning,
>> Winmx looks pretty clunky next to Emule, and now the memory-leak will
>> never be fixed...
>>
>> What think you?
>
> Fair weather turncoat.
>
ow! that cuts....

I shall be running the ramshackle old thing for as long as there is an
OS that it runs on...would like to see it prosper, that's all...

> Don
> NP: "I Was Country When Country Wasn't Cool" - Barbara Mandrell

Hey when did country get cool? - I missed it ;)

[Back to original message]