Posted by Mattinglyfan on 01/16/19 11:45

"Jeff Rife" <wevsr@nabs.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1eb19f72f7ec582998a492@news.nabs.net...
> Fred Liken (nothanks@toocoolforschool.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
>> "SpanishTeacher" <kyler.jackson@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1145551339.600748.92330@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > "Sony basically made a portable PS2. Over 90%
>> > of the games on it are garbage."
>> >
>> > The stupidity of this statement is astounding. Well over 60% of the
>> > games released on PSP received over a 70% or better on gamerankings
>>
>> 70% is barely a C, dude...
>
> It's worse than that. *All* the PSP games there seem to get over 50%,
> because until they have enough ratings, they don't get a number (likely
> to make sure a first rating that is low won't show up as "this game
> sucks"). So, 70% is really closer to "half the people like it, half
> don't".
>

Do you know what you are even talking about? I already pointed out quite a
few games (6) with over 87% that have more than 60 ratings. WTF would bring
you to to the conclusion that 70% is closer to "half the people like it,
half don't". Have you ever read how Gamerankings works or are you just
talking out of your ass.

> Because of the oversight by the licensor (Sony or Nintendo), the game
> is checked out before release to the point that almost every game will
> get 30-50% at worst (and most of the lower ratings would be because a
> game wasn't what somebody expected...not because it was actually bad).
>
> --
> Jeff Rife |
> | http://www.nabs.net/Cartoons/OverTheHedge/SlowInternet.jpg

[Back to original message]