Reply to Re: Adjusting overscan implications

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Dave Plowman (News) on 04/23/06 12:08

In article <9NI2g.56827$Nh7.56017@newsfe4-win.ntli.net>,
Justin Cole <jus.coleNO@S-P-A-Mntlworld.com> wrote:
> > Total bollocks. I've worked in TV production for over 40 years and
> > there is no such thing as domestic cutoff for things which shouldn't
> > be in shot. You allow for this in the framing of important things,
> > though. But even then not all domestic sets are the same.

> Indeed, if there's a mic or something that shouldn't be there then it's
> a real error! Not assumed to be removed by framing...

Yup. Of course it's sometimes possible to paint out a mic dipping in in
post.

--
*If a pig loses its voice, is it disgruntled? *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  статьи на английском  •  England, UK  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  IT news, forums, messages
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites
Разработано в студии "Webous"