Posted by Groucho on 04/27/06 12:04

"Axel VK" <axl@pigpond.com> wrote in message
news:4450a353$0$30731$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Groucho" <nowhere@home.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4bb1n2F10knpbU1@individual.net...
>> By who's criteria ? Yours? The 109 was fine but the 110 was crap, with
>> well documented unresolved problems as far as burning a lot of 16x media
>> at 16x. The 111 is too new and firmware still immature.
>
> Hmm. I've got a 110 and have not had any problems whatsoever.
Then you've merely been fortunate not to encounter media it dislikes or
winds the rated speed back on is all.

[Back to original message]