Posted by Axel VK on 04/27/06 14:10

"Groucho" <nowhere@home.invalid> wrote in message
news:4bbq89F102hkpU1@individual.net...
>
> "Axel VK" <axl@pigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:4450a353$0$30731$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>>
>> "Groucho" <nowhere@home.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:4bb1n2F10knpbU1@individual.net...
>>> By who's criteria ? Yours? The 109 was fine but the 110 was crap, with
>>> well documented unresolved problems as far as burning a lot of 16x media
>>> at 16x. The 111 is too new and firmware still immature.
>>
>> Hmm. I've got a 110 and have not had any problems whatsoever.
> Then you've merely been fortunate not to encounter media it dislikes or
> winds the rated speed back on is all.

I never burn any faster than 4X anyway so there may be issues that I'm not
aware of.

[Back to original message]