|
Posted by Fred Liken on 04/28/06 14:13
"Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
news:mn.dbb87d647e355534.1980@nobody.invalid...
> On 4/27/2006, Fred Liken posted this:
>> "Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:mn.da707d648373b1bc.1980@nobody.invalid...
>>
>>>>>> Macs are for sheep.
>>>>>
>>>>>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh-huh.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, Macs are for sheep.
>>>
>>> Let's think about this logic: 95% of the world uses PCs (i.e., WinTel)
>>> and 5% use Macs, and the *Macs users* are the sheep?
>>>
>>> As a PC user, all I can say is Baa...
>>
>> Or... most people aren't sheep?
>
> I'm not quite sure that you understand the term you yourself chose. People
> usually use 'sheep' to refer to the masses, not the exceptional persons.
Actually, sheep is used to refer to those easily "hearded".
> I say that even though it makes me a member of the masses in this case, as
> a PC user with hardly any knowledge of the Mac.
>
> However, as I promised elsewhere, I'm going to get off your case now.
lol. Just stop posting and stop trying to save face. It's pathetic.
[Back to original message]
|