Posted by Gene E. Bloch on 04/28/06 18:27

On 4/28/2006, Fred Liken posted this:
> "Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
> news:mn.dbb87d647e355534.1980@nobody.invalid...
>> On 4/27/2006, Fred Liken posted this:
>>> "Gene E. Bloch" <spamfree@nobody.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:mn.da707d648373b1bc.1980@nobody.invalid...
>>>
>>>>>>> Macs are for sheep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh-huh.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, Macs are for sheep.
>>>>
>>>> Let's think about this logic: 95% of the world uses PCs (i.e., WinTel)
>>>> and 5% use Macs, and the *Macs users* are the sheep?
>>>>
>>>> As a PC user, all I can say is Baa...
>>>
>>> Or... most people aren't sheep?
>>
>> I'm not quite sure that you understand the term you yourself chose. People
>> usually use 'sheep' to refer to the masses, not the exceptional persons.
>
> Actually, sheep is used to refer to those easily "hearded".
>
>> I say that even though it makes me a member of the masses in this case, as
>> a PC user with hardly any knowledge of the Mac.
>>
>> However, as I promised elsewhere, I'm going to get off your case now.
>
> lol. Just stop posting and stop trying to save face. It's pathetic.

OK, I will, but by my newsreader's count at this moment, if I post one
more time, it'll bring the length of this thread to 498, so I *have* to
post a reply.

G.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Gino)
letters617blochg3251
(replace the numbers by "at" and "dotcom")

[Back to original message]