Posted by Fred Liken on 05/04/06 20:31

"Brenden D. Chase" <brenden.chaseREMOVE@THISgmail.com> wrote in message
news:CwQ5g.39038$_z2.16662@dukeread02...
>
>>
>> Because helping them helps the US. And we do take care of ourselves.
>> There's SS,
>
> There's SS... where? Or rather.. what little is left.

SS is paid EVERY TIME. I think what you're talking about are the supposed
funds held back to cover future claims against the insurance part, which
congress opened up for pilfering. It was "supposed" to be independant, also
optional, but you know how they do things.

>>soup kitchens, pantries, etc, for the hungry. Poverty is unavoidable if
>>people are allowed the freedoms given them in the US.
>
> I can agree with that, my list was merely a pipe dream anyhow.
>
>> Even usurping the freedoms doesn't guarantee an end to poverty unless
>> you regulate procreation and instate capital punishment for what we view
>> as not even crimes. Clean up the streets, again, is something that is
>> very difficult in the US and any country afforded the freedoms the US
>> affords its citizens. Educate the kids... well... there's a place you
>> could make real changes by repealing the left wing nonsense that has
>> plagued the school
>
> Left wing, right wing.... the way i look at it, i'm tired of the bullshit
> politics.

Say what you want, but when it comes to schools, the left wing is simply
wrong. They lack the ability to discipline with their hippy views and PC
nonsense. Everyone loses.

> The person that created different party designations should be shot.

They're a natural progression of politics on this scale.

> What ever happened to just having your own opinion. who cares what party
> its from.

People do, and they support the party that they believe (right or wrong) has
their most important views as their own. You'll never be able to have a
party that has all of its members views as its own of any significant size.
But, honestly, at the congressional level, votes don't always go party
lines. They vote for what their electors want. You've got a few that are
so set that they don't really give a shit, like Boxxer, et al, but, hey,
that's the benefits of having such an uneducated voting pool.

>> system for years and totally made the schools impotent in maintaining
>> discipline. The streets, etc, would benefit as well from better
>> discipline in the classrooms and better education.
>
> True.
>
>> But, then again, we'll have every low life parent in the city bitching
>> that their baby was spanked, even though that baby is 16 and told the
>> teacher to fuck themselves. Oh well. It's the price you have to pay for
>> freedom.
>
> I dont agree that teachers should be spanking kids, but i am all for
> parents spanking kids.

Teachers don't really spank the kids, ideally. A third party does. And if
the parents were doing their jobs, the school wouldn't have to teach the
child discipline to begin with. The child is WRONGED by not being taught
discipline if the parent won't.

> And you better believe if my kids(when i have them) get out of line, I
> will not hesitate to remove my belt. Call the police if you want, but
> truth be told, i was raised that way, and i turned out just fine along
> with the rest of my siblings. There's a big difference between child abuse
> and discipline. My mother would tell me stories about her and her sisters
> in school acting a fool.. and my grandmother getting called up there to
> straighten them out. All of them turned out just fine too. I'm all for
> that.

The problem isn't the good parents, though.

[Back to original message]