Posted by popwar on 05/09/06 02:21

low light is not a big deal to me. i was just wondering if anyone has
used the vx2000 or 2100. is there a major upgrade that would make me
want to bye the 2100 overthe 2000 and spend teh extra money? and also
remeber im not a professinal. i looked on google images and i have seen
the vx 2000 with many different lenses and the vx 2100 with only stock.
maybe our deffinitions are different? see the thing is when i google vx
2000 fisheye. for example it comes up with many different lenses.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.raynox.co.jp/english/video/vx2000/image/xl3000-vx2000.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.raynox.co.jp/german/video/vx2000/&h=212&w=283&sz=11&tbnid=_rZrwAHcfGjrwM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=110&hl=en&ei=7vtfRN30Eb_y6QGV0c2-BA&sig2=RliptH69Bm7CxP3CEnYFfw&start=3&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dvx2000%2Bfisheye%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26safe%3Dactive
that sight has many lense choices for vx 2000. the reason i asked for
interchangible lenses, is because when u google 2100 fisheye it comes
up with nothing. maybe i dont know how to google right or somthing but
that is thebest i can do. i am aware that they both have a 58 mm ring
size, ive just never worked with a 3ccd camera so i dont really know
how they work yet. if i were to but a 2100 would i be able to take the
main lense off and replace it? or just put filters?

[Back to original message]