Posted by Specs on 05/09/06 08:52

"Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
news:1147140502.492459.170250@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Specs wrote:
> .
> > >
> > My understanding of physics says retentivity is the more important
factor of
> > the two. Its pretty rich for someone to make note of the sparcity of
> > critical information when they have steadfastly
refused/incapable/unwilling
> > to produce the mearest hint of information.
>
> Your understanding of physics? Are you a tape engineer? Are you
> involved in the manufacturing process? Where did you gain this
> understanding? Can you document that retentivity is more important?
> Please produce some data to substantiate this.
>
Before deciding on a different career path I was a senior engineer in the UK
nuclear industry. My field of expertise was electromagnetic compatibility.

> While you're brushing up on your physics you might try consulting a
> dictionary to improve your spelling. As for not providing "the mearest
> (SIC) hint of information," this is simply a lie. I haven't refused
> to put out anything. You have simply refused to accept any of the data
> I put forth. The specs found on Google are put out by the
> manufacturers and are no more or less relevant than any other data.
> Furthermore, an opinion formed based on actual experience is at least
> as worthy as your Googlespecs, most of which are for the same tape
> anyway.
>
Thanks for spell checking my post. You seem to have found your level.

> > Why do you septics always seem to think someone is throw insulting
comments
> > at you when others write in a nonambiguous and direct way?
>
> Septics? Does that mean I'm from the sewer or were you trying to spell
> "skeptic?"
>
Septic Tank.....

> Regardless, your statements are simply not true. And you are
> insulting. I have not failed to provide data; I have simply failed to
> provide data that YOU accept. You don't have to challenge every
> single thing I say and when you label everything as "marketing BS" I
> would have to say that I am not the "septic"
>
Oh yes you are.

>
> > > Head life is also something we should all be concerned about and every
> > > tech I've dealt with along with various websites has found Panasonic
to
> > > be less abrasive. That can be thousands of dollars of savings along
> > > the way. I realize there is a tech referenced in this exchange who
> > > feels differently.
> > >
> > How was that measured? By rubbing it on their chins? Sorry don't buy
it.
> > Presumably you can quote coefficient of friction values for Panasonic
tape
> > vs other manufacturers?
>
> No, we sand furniture with it.. What kind of absurd statement is that?
> People have been measuring headwear with different tapes for years.
> It has primarily to do with the fineness of the particles.
Complete bollocks

>
> No I grant you Sony could be lying through their teeth and just
> laughing at all the suckers stupid enough to spend more $ on the same
> tape.
>
Panasonic were making ALL the noises regarding dropouts when recording HDV.
The internet has not been set ablaze by tens of thousands of people
complaining about dropouts with HDV. Panasonic are bullshit artists. Mugs
like you, Mr. Tapeshit, eat it up and spread your unqualified and
unquantifiable BS if you think it'll get you some tape sales to the wedding
crowd to put in their shitty JVCs.

Come back when you know what you are talking about. If its taken you 20
years to get this far I doubt whether I'll hear from you again.

Do yourself a favour and start your education here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockney_Rhyming_Slang

[Back to original message]