Posted by Richard Crowley on 01/11/20 11:48

mmaker wrote ...
> Richard Crowley wrote:
>> Else, IMHO "HDV" is actually lower quality than regular "DV"
>> because it is more highly compressed to fit all that much more
>> video into the same tape bandwidth. HDV is at the opposite
>> end of the spectrum from 35mm film with DV somewhere in
>> the middle.
>
> What an absolutely bizarre claim. I take it you've never actually shot
> HDV?

10 pounds in a 5 pound sack.
As they say on the right side of the Pond,
"You do the maths."

[Back to original message]