Posted by Hammerer on 05/28/06 17:45

"FatKat" <robynari@juno.com> wrote in message
news:1148819841.617168.15990@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
>
> kim wrote:
>
> > "Paul Nador" <palika@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> > news:4478ee87$0$22807$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> > > No I didn't, though I had some software changes
> > > like XP/SP2 and AVG antivirus.
> > >
>
> > That wasn't a question. It was what passes for sarcasm in
> > Hammerer's universe.
> >
>
> Doesn't fit the Hammerer sarcasm pattern - it might have if the
> OP had actually said that he hadn't changed any settings (and
> nothing more specific than that). Since he didn't,
>
Dear-oh-dear, Fats. For someone who may, or may not, be in the legal trade,
you sure don't read the fine print, do you?!
>
> and because Hammerer's response didn't include a funny version
> of the OP's name or the complete screen name and e-mail address,
>
Jesus, Fats! I did in my second post! Give me some credit!
>
> this might be one of those few Hammerer plain-language responses.
>
Yes. It wasn't too bad, was it? It was very early in the morning, you see.
Five minutes later, I was in a coma.
>
> In contradistinction, just compare that response to the one that
> I'm most likely going to get now, and you'll see the difference.
>
You've been hoisted by your own Picard, Fats. I'm not going to add to the,
erm, contradistinction.

[Back to original message]