Posted by Chris Ridd on 05/30/06 06:03

On 30/5/06 1:25, in article e24n72905kbtksjmotr7vh4iedmfmtqqrg@4ax.com, "Tim
Auton" <tim.auton@uton.groupSexWithoutTheY> wrote:

> NRen2k5 <nomore@email.com> wrote:
>> John C. Randolph wrote:
>>> On 2006-05-29 06:44:50 -0700, Gary Tait <classicsat@yahoo.com> said:
>>>> So the iPod/iTunes is able to play tracks purchased from online music
>>>> vendors that use PlaysForSure (PFS).
>>>
>>> So, Apple should rescue their failing competitors? Sorry, I just don't
>>> see any logic there.
>>
>> So Apple should be permitted to have a monopoly?
>
> Why shouldn't they?

And to stop having a monopoly they give it to Microsoft instead? Well I
suppose Microsoft has experience in being a monopoly, but I still can't
imagine any sane company wanting to do this.

Cheers,

Chris

[Back to original message]