Posted by John on 06/06/06 22:23

NoNoBadDog! wrote:
> "John" <Johnnospam@spamex.com> wrote in message
> news:8c2dnRSBIOTtZxjZnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> NoNoBadDog! wrote:
>>> "John" <Johnnospam@spamex.com> wrote in message
>>> news:LOCdnR7ng7c9kRjZnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> NoNoBadDog! wrote:
>>>>> "Bob" <spam@uce.gov> wrote in message
>>>>> news:44842620.86313781@news-server.houston.rr.com...
>>>>>> On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 07:47:01 -1000, "NoNoBadDog!"
>>>>>> <Diespammers@notme.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You cannot believe that the Davidians are completely blameless
>>>>>>> in this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Name one thing they are guilty of doing in terms of breaking the
>>>>>> law. --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "There is much to be said in favor of
>>>>>> the Internet. By giving us the opinions
>>>>>> of the uneducated, it keeps us in touch
>>>>>> with the ignorance of the community."
>>>>>
>>>>> Refusing a federal court order to allow US officials to enter the
>>>>> compound to verify the health and welfare of those living there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Refusing a district court order to release the records concerning
>>>>> the status of the assets given to Koresh by disenchanted members.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are other court orders and edicts that were ignored..just
>>>>> like your selective ignorance of facts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bobby
>>>>
>>>> The Gov had plenty of chances to nab him but refused. There agenda
>>>> was to disembowel him.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please provide documentation to back up your assertion.
>>>
>>> Bobby
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/koresh/9.html
>>
>> Mike Wallace, journalist
>>
>> Nevertheless, there was no doubt that the initiating ATF raid was ill
>> planned and completely unnecessary. Koresh could have been arrested
>> peacefully away from the compound while a search was activated.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Again, the link you posted is an *opinion*. It is not based upon hard
> evidence. Post a single link to a document produced anywhere within
> the US government stating that Koresh or his followers were to be
> killed.
> News stories, unless accompanied by hard evidence, are subjective at
> best.
> Mike Wallace, while a creditable reporter, does have the right to
> state and *opinion*, as he did in this piece. I would argue the same
> points with him that I debate here with you. Where is the
> documentation?
>

Man do I have to explain life to you? Like any event in history there are
many accounts and view points. If you care about anything it is your duty to
research as much as available and then develop and INFORMED decision on your
own. If you reply on merely one source (evening news) you will become
severely handicapped. It all comes down to you believe what you chose.Once
again communication with someone of such limits is fruitless.

[Back to original message]