Posted by Justin on 06/09/06 16:34

Richard C. wrote on [Fri, 9 Jun 2006 08:18:18 -0700]:
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
> news:slrne8h15h.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:35:46 -0700]:
>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>
>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>> news:slrne8gp7s.shr.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>> Richard C. wrote on [Thu, 8 Jun 2006 07:45:14 -0700]:
>>>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>>>
>>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:slrne8dr1e.l2a.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>>>> Richard C. wrote on [Wed, 7 Jun 2006 07:12:25 -0700]:
>>>>>>> X-No-archive: yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Justin" <nospam@insightbb.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:slrne8chsb.h76.nospam@debian.dns2go.com...
>>>>>>>> west488@yahoo.com wrote on [6 Jun 2006 19:59:11 -0700]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> YAHOO AUCTIONS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fix your sig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ===========================
>>>>>>> Fix your eyes.
>>>>>>> His sig works just fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The sig quoted above was not just fine. If you don't know what you're
>>>>>> talking about shut up
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================
>>>>> I know exactly what I am talking about.
>>>>> It looks fine. That is a fact and the truth.
>>>>> If it looks "wrong" to you, tough shit!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Talking out of your arse again.
>>>>
>>>> The sig delimeter was 66% incorrect. It was just [--] instead of [-- ]
>>>>
>>>> Now, go prove you're a moron elsewhere.
>>>
>>> =============================
>>> That merely demonstrates that you are way too anal!
>>
>> Or that perhaps, with the standards in place, newsreaders are able to
>> differentiate between content and signature. Imagine that. With
>> different colours and everything.
>
> ======================
> OH BOY! Colors and everything!
> Wow! What a deal!
> Sorry, but I read text.........................

Yes, so do I. On a text based reader, through a text based terminal, in
colour.

[Back to original message]