|
|
Posted by Mr. Tapeguy on 06/10/06 13:37
nappy wrote:
> "Mr. Tapeguy" <mr.tapeguy@pro-tape.com> wrote in message
> news:1149745111.726126.48260@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > nappy wrote:
> >>
> >> I contend that most FCP users are using a NLE for the first time. That ,
> >> however, does not make my arms longer. You have three friends with
> >> different
> >> experience. For other first time users without anything to compare their
> >> experience to ..
> >> I am sure they are happy with what they have. On the other hand if you
> >> move
> >> from a slick , fast. trouble free system to FCP you may have other issues
> >> with it. Avid or not.
> >>
> >
> > There is no evidence whatsoever to support this. Many FCS users have
> > used other systems.
>
> right.. I did say 'most' .
Again, there is no evidence to support this. FCP was not the first
system around and chances are a great percentage of its users started
with something else. "Most" would have to be a strong majority and I'd
love for you to substantiate this claim in any way whatsoever.
> >
> > Your second statement implies that all FCP systems are problematic.
>
> Compared to some... they indeed are.. Slower renders, bad error handling
> and dependability are the main issues.. Simply go to any FCP forum and read
> away..
User forums, by their very nature, are filled with questions about
solving problems. Read the Avid list or how about the Pinnacle forums?
Give me a break. Doy!
>
> > Your experience is not the norm, although very few non-linear systems
> > are "trouble free" and that's the nature of the beast.
>
> Thanks for sharing that Craig.
Anytime!
> > Craig
> >
> > http://www.pro-tape.com
> >
> > Mini DV Tape under $2 - MiniDisc under $1 - Video, Audio and Data Media
>
> cheezy sig Craig.
Thanks for the tip! (whatever your real name is)
You're right - "nappy" is MUCH better! What would be a good one for
me? Slappy? Sleepy? Bashful? Doc?
Craig
http://www.pro-tape.com
Adobe - Apple - Avid - Canon - Digidesign - JVC - Panasonic - Primera -
Sony
[Back to original message]
|